Ryn Forquer Blogpost #2: Is AI Art Stealing from Artists?
As AI becomes more advanced, something we have seen more and more controversy around is AI-generated art. AI-generated art raises many questions, such as, what is art? What makes someone an artist? Does using technology in your art make it less “artful”? But besides the philosophical questions it raises, we are now beginning to see the questions it raises around copyright. The New Yorker's article, "Is AI Art Stealing from Artists?" showcases that artists worldwide are raising complaints as they see AI create art eerily similar to theirs. The article mentions explicitly artist Kelly McKernan, who is participating in a class-action lawsuit against specific A.I. generators, including Midjourney, Stable Diffusionm, and DreamUp. The central claims of this lawsuit center around the database that informs these generators, which is called Laion-5B. Laion-5B, simply put, is a database full of billions of images, which AI generators can pull from to generate new photos/pieces of art. The issue is that many artists’ copyrighted works are in this database without the artists’ consent. In addition to that, there are two other main issues outlined in the lawsuit. The second issue is that although many AI tools charge users for their services, no artists are compensated for the works used in the Laion-5B database. Thirdly, many artists take issue with the fact that though their works are included in the Laion-5B database and inform the generation of AI art, they are not being credited for their contribution to the piece– though without their work, the pieces generated by AI would change.
![]() |
| Fig. 1, McKernan, Kelly. Empathetic, Watercolor and Acrylic, 2018, https://www.kellymckernan.com/shop/empathic. |
![]() |
| Fig. 2, image generated by Midjourney. Image in the style of Kelly McKernan 3. December 11, 2022. https://thaeyne.com/2022/12/11/image-in-the-style-of-kelly-mckernan-3/ |
So, even in cases of human-made art, the issues of copyright and fair use are nuanced, convoluted, and highly situational. The confusion is only compounded by the rapid rise of AI and the fact that it often takes years for federal law to catch up to technology.
Overall, the issue of AI artwork raises questions about the nature of art– what makes art art? What makes an artist an artist? Does the process matter more than the result when defining art? How much creative self-sufficiency must an artist have to maintain creative integrity? These questions are already prominent in the art world today, and they will only get louder as AI becomes more advanced.
Chayka, Kyle. “Is A.I. Art Stealing from Artists?” The New Yorker, February 10, 2023. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/is-ai-art-stealing-from-artists.
Vogue, Ariane de. “Supreme Court Rules against Andy Warhol in Copyright Dispute over Prince Portrait | CNN Politics.” CNN, May 18, 2023. https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/18/politics/supreme-court-prince-andy-warhol/index.html.


Comments
Post a Comment