Contemporary Art: A Very Short Introduction (2nd ed) Julian Stallabrass (Blog Post #1 - Chuck Doyle)
Contemporary Art: A Very Short Introduction (2nd ed) Julian Stallabrass The book
traces art from its root to modern day and the impacts of social, political, and
economic evolution. Chapter 1 explains that Art was initially driven by the
extremely wealthy who could afford to support an artist while directing their
activities. It talks to economic and political reform, racism and gender bias,
conservative censorship. Initially owned and directed by politically correct
elderly white men, the artists were primarily white male, the subjects of the
art were white female. As the gay population became involved subjects shifted to
nude males. The conservative force that had driven the art world referred to
their work as pornography and denounced it. As the finances of the world
shifted, the money required to effect which artists were in favor also shifted
from the extremely wealthy aristocracy to the nouveau riche. Political forces
came into play, as did major recessions and other economic issues. The shift of
the art market with various trade agreements between countries allowed money and
the art itself to freely flow from country to country. To try to control this
display strategies changed from forms that were easily transportable to huge
installations that require patrons to come into museums if they wanted to view
it.
Figure 1 St Stephens Cathedral ©ChuckDoyle 2023 In Chapter 2 there is discussion
of the proliferation of biennial art shows and the many challenges that became
included as the movement grew. The wealthy traveling the globe from one biennial
or transnational art event to another resulted initially in largely production
of homogenous art. The tastes of this group decided what sold and what did not
sell. The chapter further discusses the very different markets that developed in
post-communist Russia and Scandinavia contrasted with China and Cuba, countries
that retained communism. In Russia, according to Stallabrass, those favored by
the autocracy were given or sold state assets at risible prices, some of whom
became major collectors of art. As they grew fabulously wealthy, they could
decree which artists succeeded by their preferences. Commoners had no influence
because they did not accrue wealth. In Scandinavia, modernism and social
democracy were strongly associated. Recession and its consequences caused a
shift in art from utilitarian design. The artist became an indicator of the
degree of freedom in Scandinavian society. As Russia collapsed, Cuba found
itself as a small island nation largely on its own financially. There was a
crackdown on artistic freedom, avant-garde shows were closed. As Cuban artists
remained in Cuba and were allowed to travel and sell works for dollars, they
lived very well. China pursued a state- guided capitalism, which keeps its
super-rich with the money to control the art world. Both Chinese and Cuban
governments had relaxed their hold on their economies, permitting limited
private enterprise.
Figure 2 Ilok, Croatia, Abandoned Store, ©ChuuckDoyle2023 References
Stallabrass, J. (2020). 1. a zone of freedom? In (Ed.), Contemporary art: A very
short introduction (2nd ed., pp. 1–25). Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198826620.003.0001 Stallabrass, J., & .
(2020). 2. new world order. In Contemporary art: A very short introduction (2nd
ed., pp. 26–61). Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198826620.003.0002


Comments
Post a Comment